AMD, which goes to resume its RDNA 2 structure, will quickly launch the brand new technology RX 6000 graphics playing cards. We took a have a look at the technical specs of the RX 6950 XT, RX 6750 XT and RX 6650 XT. Afterwards, the official listing costs of those playing cards got here to gentle.
Moreover the costs, it was a matter of curiosity how a lot efficiency enhance the upcoming playing cards would supply. Now there are new leaks concerning the efficiency of the renewed playing cards in 4K, 1440p and 1080p resolutions. Additionally, evidently this efficiency information is predicated on official displays from AMD.
Judging by the benchmarks by AMD, the RX 6950 XT flagship graphics card will likely be 11% sooner than the non-Ti GeForce RTX 3090. Apparently, AMD didn’t use the RTX 3090 Ti (450W) on this comparability. Nonetheless, let’s be aware that the cardboard energy of the upcoming RX 6950 XT and RTX 3090 is sort of equal (350/335W).
- RX 6950 XT vs. RX 6900 XT: 4% efficiency distinction.
- RX 6950 XT vs. RTX 3090: 11% efficiency distinction.
- RX 6750 XT vs. RX 6700 XT: 7% efficiency distinction.
- RX 6750 XT vs. RTX 3070: 2% efficiency distinction.
- RX 6650 XT vs. RX 6600 XT: 2% efficiency distinction.
- RX 6650 XT vs. RTX 3060: 23% efficiency distinction.
Additionally, the RX 6750 XT appears to be essentially the most outstanding mannequin for the Radeon RX 6x50XT collection. In comparison with the RX 6700 XT, the renewed mannequin gives a mean of seven% higher efficiency at 1440p decision. In keeping with these information, the RX 6700 collection will now surpass NVIDIA RTX 3070 playing cards by 2%.
With a prompt worth of $399, the Radeon RX 6650 XT will supply solely 2% higher efficiency than its predecessor (RX 6600 XT). The reminiscence velocity will likely be 1.5 Gbps increased, whereas the TDP will enhance by 20W. Then again, official figures present that it’s going to supply 23% increased efficiency than the non-Ti RTX 3060.
Once more, the talked about information is predicated on the official data of the pink folks. Let’s additionally be aware that a lot of the video games listed are optimized for AMD {hardware}. For that reason, it’s helpful to see unbiased opinions.
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (3840×2160 / 4K) Gaming Efficiency
| The sport | AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | 6950 XT vs RTX 3090 | 6950 XT vs 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murderer’s Creed Valhalla (DX12 Extremely Excessive) | 81 | 77 | 67 | +21% | +5% |
| Battlefield 5 (DX11 Extremely) | 129 | 123 | 120 | +8% | +5% |
| Borderlands 3 (DX12 Badass) | 78 | 75 | 68 | +15% | +4% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (DX12 Excessive) | 64 | 61 | 65 | -2nd% | +5% |
| Deathloop (DX12 Extremely) | 77 | 74 | 76 | +1% | +4% |
| Doom Everlasting (Vulkan Nightmare) | 159 | 152 | 144 | +10% | +5% |
| F1 2021 (DX12 Extremely Excessive) | 152 | 151 | 120 | +27% | +1% |
| Far Cry 6 (DX12 Extremely) | 95 | 90 | 81 | +17% | +6% |
| Forza Horizon 5 (DX12 Max) | 69 | 66 | 65 | +6% | +5% |
| GTA V (DX11 Extremely) | 152 | 148 | 159 | -4% | +3% |
| Hitman 3 (DX12 Extremely Dubai) | 150 | 146 | 120 | +25% | +3% |
| Metro Exodus (DX12 Excessive) | 72 | 70 | 70 | +3% | +3% |
| Resident Evil Village (DX12 Max) | 140 | 135 | 115 | +22% | +4% |
| The Riftbreaker (DX12 Extremely) | 229 | 221 | 213 | +8% | +4% |
| Deathloop (DX12 Extremely RT) | 93 | – | 106 | -12% | – |
| Far Cry 6 (DX12 Extremely RT) | 123 | – | 107 | +15% | – |
| F1 2021 (DX12 Extremely Excessive RT) | 139 | – | 138 | +1% | – |
| Resident Evil Village (DX12 Raytracing Max) | 147 | – | 149 | -one% | – |
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (2560×1440) Gaming Efficiency
| The sport | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6700XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | 6750 XT vs RTX 3070 | 6750 XT vs 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murderer’s Creed Valhalla (DX12 Extremely Excessive) | 93 | 85 | 77 | +21% | +9% |
| Battlefield 5 (DX11 Extremely) | 163 | 153 | 149 | +9% | +7% |
| Borderlands 3 (DX12 Badass) | 88 | 82 | 82 | +7% | +7% |
| Management (DX12 Excessive) | 71 | 67 | 76 | -7% | +6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (DX12 Excessive) | 73 | 67 | 77 | -5% | +9% |
| Dying Stranding (DX12 Very Excessive) | 209 | 193 | 179 | +17% | +8% |
| Dust 5 (DX12 Extremely Excessive) | 103 | 97 | 103 | 0% | +6% |
| Doom Everlasting (Vulkan Nightmare) | 171 | 159 | 167 | +2% | +8% |
| Far Cry 6 (DX12 Extremely) | 105 | 98 | 102 | +3% | +7% |
| Forza Horizon 5 (DX12 Max) | 72 | 68 | 75 | -4% | +6% |
| Hitman 3 (DX12 Extremely Dubai) | 164 | 153 | 156 | +5% | +7% |
| Metro Exodus (DX12 Excessive) | 68 | 64 | 73 | -7% | +6% |
| Resident Evil Village (DX12 Max) | 154 | 145 | 146 | +5% | +6% |
| Shadow of The Tomb Raider (DX12 Highest) | 129 | 121 | 128 | +1% | +7% |
| Overwatch (DX11 EPIC) | 241 | 223 | 274 | -12% | +8% |
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (1920×1080) Gaming Efficiency
| The sport | AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6600XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | 6650 XT vs RTX 3060 | 6650 XT vs 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murderer’s Creed Valhalla (DX12 Extremely Excessive) | 100 | 98 | 73 | +37% | +2% |
| Battlefield 5 (DX11 Extremely) | 170 | 166 | 134 | +27% | +2% |
| Borderlands 3 (DX12 Badass) | 103 | 101 | 74 | +40% | +3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (DX12 Excessive) | 77 | 75 | 70 | +15% | +2% |
| Deathloop (DX12 Extremely) | 100 | 98 | 79 | +27% | +2% |
| F1 2021 (DX12 Extremely Excessive) | 176 | 172 | 123 | +43% | +2% |
| Far Cry 6 (DX12 Extremely) | 122 | 119 | 97 | +26% | +3% |
| Forza Horizon 5 (DX12 Max) | 73 | 71 | 60 | +21% | +3% |
| Ghostwire Tokyo (DX12, Max SSAO) | 126 | 123 | 100 | +27% | +2% |
| God of Battle (DX11 Extremely) | 64 | 63 | 55 | +17% | +2% |
| GTA V (DX11 Extremely) | 170 | 169 | 174 | -2nd% | +1% |
| Hitman 3 (DX12 Extremely Dubai) | 197 | 193 | 157 | +25% | +2% |
| Metro Exodus (DX12 Excessive) | 63 | 62 | 54 | +17% | +2% |
| RDR 2 (DX12 Extremely) | 63 | 61 | 52 | +21% | +3% |
| Apex Legends (DX11 Extremely Excessive) | 201 | 197 | 166 | +21% | +2% |
| Fortnite (DX12 EPIC) | 126 | 124 | 119 | +7% | +2% |
